Translate

Monday 24 August 2015

 

Public Information Content   

http://www.dhs.gov/











 Please click below to go 

direct to CDC's Websites:

 

The World Under Threat

Terror Alert Status:YELLOW

For Children, Young Adults and Students

You too can be a CDC Detective!

Scroll to near the very bottom of this 

page to get the latest CDC Atlanta iPad app you can use 

to save the world from a mysterious infectious disease 

outbreak or just click here  

The Refugee Crisis in Europe

Public Health Alert

You do not want to miss the new Edition of the                                                                                    CDC Journal: Volume 21, Issue 9 - September 2015                                                                            Issue,Now Online, as it coincides with a major                                                                          humanitarian catastrophe unfolding  in Europe

                                                  

THEME ISSUE: Emerging Infections Program
TUBERCULOSIS AND OTHER MYCOBACTERIA ARTICLES

  

CDC - Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - CDC 24/7: Saving Lives. Protecting People.™
EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES®
EID Journal
Ahead of Print
Current Cover
Podcasts
Become an Author
Become a Reviewer
Contact EID
Announcements
CDC
EID Stacks
DESKTOP ICON INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS
SUBMIT MANUSCRIPT
Follow us on Twitter @CDC_EIDjournal
EID Podcasts
-
EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 21, Issue 9 - September 2015 Issue Now Online
THEME ISSUE: Emerging Infections Program
TUBERCULOSIS AND OTHER MYCOBACTERIA ARTICLES
-
Increase in Lymphadenitis Cases after Shift in BCG Vaccine Strain
G. Kuchukhidze et al.

EID 20 YEARS - EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES

CDC 24/7 - Saving Lives, Protecting People, Saving Money. CDC.gov/24-7 Dept of Health and Human Services Logo Learn Vital Information about Making Health Care Safer
CDC on Facebook CDC on Twitter CDC YouTube Channel



background
CDC Around the World
background
Aug. 26, 2015
Connect with us: Facebook Twitter Flickr Blog YouTube
IN THIS MESSAGE:
Family Vax Portrait on Motorbike
PHOTO OF THE WEEK
CDC is working with partners to wipe out polio in Africa for good. View Large Photo
Spotlighted Topic of the Week: Africa goes one year without wild polio case
CDC Ebola Updates
In the News
On the Calendar
Spotlighted Topic of the Week: Africa goes one year without wild polio case
Blog of the Week
WIPE OUT POLIO IN AFRICA FOR GOOD
This week, we detailed in a report with cautious optimism that polio will be gone not only in Nigeria but in all of Africa.
Only a few years ago, Nigeria was Africa’s last outpost of polio and seemed to be losing the battle against the disease. In 2012, Nigeria recorded 122 cases — more than half of all cases worldwide...read more
Blog of the week
Infographic of the Week
ON THE ROAD TO A POLIO-FREE NIGERIA
View full-sized infographic
Rotary Infographic
Video of the Week
NIGERIA ONE YEAR MILESTONE
On July 24th, the West African nation will have gone one full year with no new cases of wild-polio virus…watch video
Video Polio in Nigeria
Story of the Week
MAKING SURE NO CHILD IS FORGOTTEN—REACHING CHILDREN IN REFUGEE CAMPS
This is a refugee camp administered by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) in South Sudan. South Sudan declared independence in 2011, making it the world’s youngest nation. The country has an incredibly large number of refugees and internally displaced persons due to ongoing conflict and violence in the region…read story
Making sure no child is forgotten – reaching children in refugee camps
CDC Ebola Updates
Latest Outbreak Info
The World Health Organization has reported 28,041 cases of Ebola and 11,302 deaths worldwide…read more
Q & A on Ebola
Podcast: CDC Ebola Response Update
Updated Review of Human-to-Human Transmission of Ebola Virus
2014 Ebola Outbreak in West Africa
In the News
100 Most Influential People in Healthcare
Modern Healthcare

China shows strong support for smoking ban: Survey
Channel NewsAsia



On the Calendar
September 9: International Fetal Alcohol Syndrome Awareness Day
September 10: World Suicide Prevention Day
September 21: World Alheizmer's Day
September 29: World Heart Day

CDC 24/7 - Saving Lives, Protecting People, Saving Money. CDC.gov/24-7 Dept of Health and Human Services Logo Learn Vital Information about Making Health Care Safer
CDC on Facebook CDC on Twitter CDC YouTube Channel






CDC - Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - CDC 24/7: Saving Lives. Protecting People.™
EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES®
EID Journal
Ahead of Print
Current Cover
Podcasts
Become an Author
Become a Reviewer
Contact EID
Announcements
CDC
EID Stacks
DESKTOP ICON INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS
SUBMIT MANUSCRIPT
Follow us on Twitter @CDC_EIDjournal
EID Podcasts
-
EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 21, Issue 9 - September 2015 Issue Now Online
THEME ISSUE: Emerging Infections Program
ENTERIC INFECTIONS ARTICLES
-
Emerging Infections Program—State Health Department Perspective
J. L. Hadler et al.
Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network—2 Decades of Achievements, 1996–2015
O. L. Henao et al.
Socioeconomic Status and Foodborne Pathogens in Connecticut, USA, 2000–2011
B. M. Whitney et al.
Tracking Pertussis and Evaluating Control Measures through Enhanced Pertussis Surveillance, Emerging Infections Program, United States
T. H. Skoff et al.
EID 20 YEARS - EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES

CDC 24/7 - Saving Lives, Protecting People, Saving Money. CDC.gov/24-7 Dept of Health and Human Services Logo Learn Vital Information about Making Health Care Safer
CDC on Facebook CDC on Twitter
CDC YouTube Channel

Public Information Content   

Please click below to go 

direct to NIH.gov Websites:

 

Buena Salud

Los estudios clínicos y las personas mayores

El Sr. Perez tiene 73 años de edad y acaba de enterarse que tiene la enfermedad de Alzheimer. Le preocupa cómo esta enfermedad afectará su vida diaria. ¿Se le olvidará tomar su medicamento? ¿Se le olvidarán sus recuerdos favoritos? El médico del Sr. Perez le pidió que pensara en participar en un estudio clínico, pero la idea de hacerlo lo hace sentirse nervioso. ¿Qué es un estudio clínico? ¿Podría empeorar su memoria?
Al igual que le pasa al Sr. Perez, es posible que usted haya oído hablar de los estudios clínicos, pero tal vez no esté seguro de lo que son o si quiere participar en uno de ellos. A continuación se presenta alguna información que puede ayudarle a decidir si participar en un estudio clínico es una buena idea para usted. Las palabras en letra negrita, junto con otros términos importantes, se explican al final del documento.

¿Qué es un estudio clínico?

Un estudio clínico es un tipo particular de estudio de investigación que se lleva a cabo con personas y que está diseñado para evaluar una intervención médica, quirúrgica o conductual.
La mayoría de los estudios clínicos prueban un tratamiento nuevo, como un nuevo medicamento o dieta o aparato médico (por ejemplo, un marcapasos), como un método para tratar un problema de salud. A menudo, un estudio clínico se usa para aprender si un tratamiento nuevo es mejor y/o tiene menos efectos secundarios perjudiciales que el tratamiento estándar.
Otros estudios clínicos prueban las maneras de descubrir una enfermedad temprano, a veces hasta antes de que haya síntomas. Otros prueban maneras de prevenir un problema de salud. También es posible que un estudio clínico investigue cómo mejorar la vida de personas que están viviendo con una enfermedad que amenaza sus vidas o con un problema de salud crónico. A veces, los estudios clínicos examinan el papel que juegan las personas que cuidan a los enfermos o los grupos de apoyo.

¿Por qué desearía una persona participar en un estudio clínico?

Hay muchas razones por las cuales una persona puede escoger participar en un estudio clínico. Algunas personas deciden participar en un estudio porque los tratamientos que han probado para su problema de salud no han funcionado. Otras participan porque no hay un tratamiento para su problema de salud. Cuando forman parte de un estudio clínico, es posible que los participantes se enteren de nuevos tratamientos antes de que éstos estén ampliamente disponibles. Algunos estudios están diseñados para, o incluyen a, personas que están bien de salud pero quieren ayudar a descubrir maneras de prevenir una enfermedad que puede ser común en sus familias.
Muchas personas dicen que participar en un estudio clínico es una manera de tomar parte más activamente en el cuidado de la propia salud. Otras personas dicen que quieren ayudar a los investigadores clínicos a aprender más sobre ciertos problemas de salud.
Cualquiera que sea la motivación, cuando decide participar en un estudio clínico, usted se convierte en un componente del proceso de descubrimiento científico, y su contribución puede ayudar a las generaciones futuras a vivir vidas más saludables. Los principales avances médicos no podrían ocurrir sin la generosidad de los que participan en estudios clínicos, tanto jóvenes como personas mayores.

¿Por qué los estudios clínicos necesitan participantes mayores y con características diversas?

Es importante que los estudios clínicos tengan participantes de diferentes edades, sexos, razas y orígenes étnicos. Cuando la investigación involucra a un grupo de personas que son parecidas, es posible que los resultados obtenidos no apliquen o beneficien a todos. Cuando los estudios clínicos incluyen a participantes diversos, los resultados del estudio pueden tener una aplicabilidad mucho más amplia.
Los investigadores necesitan la participación de personas mayores en sus estudios clínicos para que los científicos puedan aprender más sobre cómo los nuevos medicamentos, terapias, aparatos médicos, procedimientos quirúrgicos o pruebas médicas funcionarán para las personas mayores.
Muchas personas mayores tienen necesidades especiales de salud que son diferentes a las de las personas más jóvenes. Por ejemplo, a medida que las personas envejecen, sus cuerpos pueden reaccionar de manera diferente a los medicamentos. Los adultos mayores pueden necesitar dosis (o cantidades) diferentes de un medicamento para obtener el resultado correcto. Además, algunos medicamentos pueden tener diferentes efectos secundarios en las personas mayores que en las personas más jóvenes. Tener personas mayores inscritas en los estudios clínicos de medicamentos ayuda a los investigadores a obtener la información que necesitan para desarrollar el tratamiento adecuado para las personas mayores.
Los investigadores saben que puede ser difícil para algunas personas mayores participar en un estudio clínico. Por ejemplo, si usted tiene muchos problemas de salud, ¿puede participar en un estudio que está investigando una sola condición? Si usted está debilitado o tiene una discapacidad, ¿tendrá suficiente fuerza para participar? Si ya no conduce un automóvil, ¿cómo llegará al sitio del estudio? Hable con el coordinador del estudio clínico sobre sus preocupaciones. Puede ser que el equipo de investigación ya haya pensado en algunos de los obstáculos que enfrentan las personas mayores y tenga un plan para hacer que sea más fácil para usted participar en el estudio.

¿Cuáles son los beneficios y riesgos de un estudio clínico?

Usted puede preguntarse lo siguiente: "¿Por qué voy a probar algo que los investigadores no están seguros va a funcionar?”. Esa es una buena pregunta. Formar parte de un estudio clínico puede tener riesgos, pero también puede tener beneficios.
Los beneficios de un estudio clínico:
  • Puede obtener un tratamiento nuevo para una enfermedad antes de que esté disponible para todos los demás.
  • Puede tomar parte de manera más activa en el cuidado de su propia salud.
  • Como parte de su tratamiento, los investigadores pueden proporcionarle atención médica y chequeos de salud más frecuentes.
  • Puede tener la oportunidad de ayudar a otros a obtener mejor tratamiento para sus problemas de salud en el futuro.
Los riesgos de un estudio clínico:
  • El nuevo tratamiento puede causar graves efectos secundarios.
  • Es posible que el nuevo tratamiento no funcione o no sea mejor que el tratamiento estándar.
  • Es posible que usted NO forme parte del grupo de tratamiento (o grupo experimental) que recibe el nuevo tratamiento, por ejemplo, un nuevo medicamento o aparato, sino que en cambio, podría ser parte del grupo de control, lo cual significa que usted recibirá el tratamiento estándar o no recibirá tratamiento (es posible que se use un placebo).
  • El estudio clínico podría causarle inconvenientes. Por ejemplo, las citas médicas pueden tomar mucho tiempo o es posible que se requiera que pase la noche o algunos días en el hospital.

Si decido tomar parte en un estudio clínico, ¿cómo se protegerá mi seguridad?

Esta es una pregunta muy importante. La historia de las investigaciones clínicas no es perfecta. Basándose en muchos años de experiencia y aprendizaje, el Congreso ha establecido leyes para proteger a los participantes de estudios clínicos. Actualmente, a todos los investigadores clínicos se les requiere que vigilen y resguarden la seguridad de todos los participantes. Estas medidas de protección son una parte esencial de la investigación científica. Los abusos que ocurrieron en algunos proyectos de investigación antes de que las medidas de protección estuvieran establecidas, NO volverán a suceder.
A los investigadores se les requiere que cumplan reglas estrictas para proteger la seguridad de los participantes. El Gobierno Federal es el encargado de hacer cumplir estas reglas. Todo estudio clínico también sigue un cuidadoso plan de estudio o protocolo que describe lo que los investigadores van a hacer. El investigador principal, o jefe del equipo de investigación, es responsable por asegurar que se siga el protocolo.
Todos los estudios clínicos realizados en los Estados Unidos deben ser aprobados por una Junta de Revisión Institucional (IRB, por sus siglas en inglés) en cada sitio donde se lleva a cabo un estudio. La Junta de Revisión está compuesta por médicos, científicos y miembros del público en general, como usted, que están dedicados a asegurar que los participantes de un estudio no son expuestos a riesgos innecesarios. Los miembros de la Junta de Revisión revisan el estudio y los resultados con regularidad. Ellos aseguran que los riesgos (o daños potenciales) para los participantes sean tan bajos como sea posible.
Junto con el IRB, muchos estudios clínicos son cuidadosamente vigilados por un Comité de Supervisión de Datos y Seguridad. El Comité está compuesto por expertos en su condición médica que periódicamente revisan los resultados del estudio mientras éste está en marcha. Si descubren que el tratamiento experimental no está funcionando o está perjudicando a los participantes, ellos pararán el estudio inmediatamente.
El proceso de consentimiento informado también ayuda a proteger a los participantes. Antes de unirse a un estudio clínico, a usted se le dará información sobre lo que puede esperar como participante y sobre todas las cosas que pueden suceder. Por ejemplo, alguien del equipo de investigación le explicará los posibles efectos secundarios u otros riesgos del tratamiento. Como parte del consentimiento informado, usted tendrá la oportunidad de hacer preguntas sobre el estudio. El coordinador del estudio clínico responderá cordialmente a sus preguntas. Después de obtener toda esa información, usted puede pensar en si quiere participar o no.
Si decide participar en el estudio, se le pedirá que firme un formulario de consentimiento informado. Al firmar el formulario, usted indica que se le han comunicado todos los detalles y que quiere ser parte del estudio. El formulario de consentimiento informado NO es un contrato. Usted puede salirse del estudio en cualquier momento y por cualquier razón sin que se le juzgue o se le ponga en una situación difícil en cuanto a su atención médica.

¿Qué preguntas debo hacer antes de decidir si quiero formar parte de un estudio clínico?

Las siguientes son algunas preguntas que puede hacerle al equipo de investigación cuando está pensando en un estudio clínico. Haga una lista con todas las preguntas que pueda tener y traiga la lista consigo cuando se reúne por primera vez con el equipo de investigación.
  • ¿Cuál es el propósito del estudio? ¿Qué está tratando de averiguar este estudio?
  • ¿Qué tendré que hacer como participante del estudio?
  • ¿Qué tratamiento o pruebas tendré? ¿Me dolerán?
  • ¿Qué probabilidad hay de que yo reciba el tratamiento experimental?
  • ¿Cuáles son los posibles riesgos, efectos secundarios y beneficios del tratamiento del estudio comparado con mi tratamiento actual?
  • ¿Cómo voy a saber si el tratamiento está funcionando?
  • ¿Cómo se protegerá mi salud mientras estoy participando en el estudio?
  • ¿Qué pasa si mi problema de salud empeora durante el transcurso del estudio?
  • ¿Cómo afectará el estudio mi vida diaria?
  • ¿Cuánto tiempo durará el estudio clínico?
  • ¿Adónde se llevará a cabo el estudio? ¿Tendré que quedarme en el hospital?
  • ¿Se me proporcionará transporte al sitio del estudio si lo necesito?
  • ¿La participación en el estudio me costará algún dinero? Si es así, ¿se me devolverá el dinero que yo gaste? ¿Mi seguro de salud cubrirá los costos?
  • ¿Puedo tomar mis medicamentos usuales mientras estoy participando en el estudio?
  • ¿Quién estará a cargo del cuidado de mi salud mientras estoy participando en el estudio? ¿Podré ver a mi propio médico?
  • ¿Se le dará seguimiento a mi salud después de que termine el estudio?
  • ¿Se me comunicarán los resultados del estudio?
  • ¿A quién puedo llamar si tengo más preguntas?

¿Adónde puedo encontrar un estudio clínico?

Hay muchas maneras de conseguir ayuda para encontrar un estudio clínico. Usted puede hablar con su médico u otro proveedor de cuidados de salud o puede hacer una búsqueda en www.ClinicalTrials.gov (actualmente disponible solamente en inglés). Los grupos de apoyo enfocados en una condición médica específica a veces tienen listas de estudios clínicos. Además, los periódicos en las ciudades grandes pueden tener anuncios de estudios clínicos en hospitales, clínicas o universidades del área cercana.
Si está interesado en aprender más sobre las investigaciones clínicas y las personas mayores, puede visitar el sitio de internet NIHSeniorHealth's Participating in Clinical Trials (actualmente disponible solamente en inglés).

¿Cuál es el próximo paso después de que encuentro un estudio clínico?

Cuando encuentra un estudio en el que tal vez quiera participar, póngase en contacto con el estudio clínico o el coordinador del estudio. Usualmente esta información de contacto se encuentra en la descripción del estudio. El primer paso del proceso es una cita inicial para determinar si usted reúne los requisitos necesarios para poder participar en el estudio. Esta cita también le brinda la oportunidad de hacer sus preguntas sobre el estudio.
Infórmele a su médico que está pensando en participar en un estudio clínico. Tal vez su médico quiera hablar con el equipo de investigación sobre su salud para asegurar que el estudio no es peligroso para usted y para coordinar su atención médica mientras usted está participando en el estudio.

¿Cuáles son algunas palabras útiles que sería bueno saber?

Coordinador del estudio clínico—a veces llamado coordinador del estudio o coordinador de la investigación clínica, a menudo éste es el título de la persona que usted puede contactar para hacer preguntas sobre el estudio o sobre su participación en éste.
Criterio de inclusión y exclusión—los factores que los investigadores usan para decidir quién puede o no puede participar en un estudio clínico. El criterio puede incluir edad, sexo, tipo y etapa de la enfermedad y otros problemas de salud.
Efectos secundarios—efectos indeseables o adversos causados por un tratamiento. Ejemplos de efectos secundarios comunes son dolor de cabeza, náusea e irritación de la piel. A veces los efectos secundarios pueden ser más graves y hasta pueden amenazar la vida.
Estudio clínico randomizado—un estudio en el cual los participantes son asignados al azar a un grupo específico de tratamiento. Los investigadores y los participantes no pueden escoger quién está en el grupo de control o en el grupo de tratamiento.
Estudio "doble ciego"—a veces llamado un estudio enmascarado, es un estudio en el cual ni los investigadores ni los participantes saben quién está en el grupo de tratamiento y quién está en el grupo de control hasta que el estudio ha terminado.
Fases—los estudios clínicos están organizados en cuatro fases o tipos. Cada fase ayuda a los científicos a contestar diferentes preguntas sobre el tratamiento. Las primeras tres fases deben ser completadas para un nuevo medicamento o aparato para poder ser aprobado por la Administración de Medicamentos y Alimentos de los Estados Unidos (FDA, por sus siglas en inglés). Después de haber sido aprobado para un uso específico, la última fase de la investigación examina los diferentes usos para un medicamento o aparato.
Grupo de control—el grupo de participantes que recibe el placebo o el tratamiento estándar, o que del todo no recibe tratamiento. No todos los estudios clínicos tienen un grupo de control.
Grupo de tratamiento—a veces llamado grupo experimental. Estos participantes recibirán el tratamiento experimental que se está probando en el estudio clínico. Los resultados del grupo de tratamiento se comparan con los del grupo de control para determinar si el tratamiento experimental es mejor y/o más seguro.
Investigadores clínicos—los investigadores que trabajan en un estudio clínico.
Placebo—una píldora u otro tratamiento que se parece al tratamiento o medicamento que está siendo probado, pero que no contiene ningún medicamento. Los placebos a veces son llamados "píldoras de azúcar." Los investigadores pueden comparar lo que le pasa a las personas que están usando el tratamiento experimental con lo que le pasa a las personas que están usando el placebo.
Protocolo—el plan detallado del estudio que será seguido para contestar las preguntas específicas de la investigación y para proteger a los participantes. El protocolo describe el criterio usado para la participación en el estudio, los tipos de pruebas que los participantes recibirán, cuánto tiempo durará el estudio, y cómo los investigadores determinarán los beneficios y riesgos.
Tratamiento estándar—una terapia que es efectiva para una enfermedad o condición específica y que actualmente se usa extensamente. Algunos estudios comparan un tratamiento nuevo experimental con un tratamiento estándar para determinar cuál es mejor para las personas. Un tratamiento estándar usualmente es un procedimiento que ha sido aprobado por la FDA.

Para más información

Para más información sobre la salud y el envejecimiento, comuníquese con el:
National Institute on Aging Information Center
(Centro de Información del Instituto Nacional Sobre el Envejecimiento)
P.O. Box 8057
Gaithersburg, MD 20898-8057
1-800-222-2225 (línea gratis)
1-800-222-4225 (TTY/línea gratis)
niaic@nia.nih.gov (correo electrónico)
www.nia.nih.gov
www.nia.nih.gov/espanol
Nuestro sitio de Internet tiene información sobre una gran variedad de temas de salud. En este sitio usted puede también ordenar publicaciones y subscribirse para recibir comunicados electrónicos. Hay disponibles especialistas en información para responder en español a las llamadas por teléfono y a los correos electrónicos.
Abril 2015
Fecha de publicación: Mayo 2015
Última actualización: Junio 5, 2015

 

 


Public Information Content   

Please click below to go 

direct to USA.gov Websites:

 

 

 Public Information Content   

Please click below to go 

direct to CDC's Websites:























CDC - Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - CDC 24/7: Saving Lives. Protecting People.™
EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES®
EID Journal
Ahead of Print
Current Cover
Podcasts
Become an Author
Become a Reviewer
Contact EID
Announcements
CDC
EID Stacks
DESKTOP ICON INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS
SUBMIT MANUSCRIPT
Follow us on Twitter @CDC_EIDjournal
EID Podcasts
-
EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 21, Issue 9 - September 2015 Issue Now Online
THEME ISSUE: Emerging Infections Program
VECTOR-BORNE INFECTIONS ARTICLES
-
Emerging Infections Program—State Health Department Perspective
J. L. Hadler et al.
Incidence of Clinician-Diagnosed Lyme Disease, United States, 2005–2010
C. A. Nelson et al.
Reemergence and Autochthonous Transmission of Dengue Virus, Eastern China, 2014
W. Wang et al.
Randomness of Dengue Outbreaks on the Equator
Y. Chen et al.

EID 20 YEARS - EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES

Wednesday 19 August 2015

ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS AND MIGRANTS

'SWARMING'

INTO EUROPE


In case you missed my previous blogs over the past two years I would like to reiterate a few matters which your mainstream media are deliberately concealing.


Before I do however, I must say that I have a problem welcoming these particular migrants and refugees from Muslim countries and from Africa.

The problem I have is not because of their color nor religion but their attitudes to women, to Gay people, to Lesbians, to the disabled and to other minority communities.


Almost without exception, none are Christian. Indeed I have heard (unconfirmed reports) that the Muslim refugees, when they hear there are African or Middle East Christians amongst their group, have resorted to murdering them rather than allow them to travel onwards to Europe with their group. While I have no proof of this, it would be no surprise to discover there was some truth, given the attitude to Christians in the Arab countries of North Africa - such as Egypt, Libya, Sudan, Algeria and in Muslim countries in the Middle East today.


We are being asked to welcome people who regard women as second class citizens whose only usage for girls is enforced marriage, female genital circumcision or mutilation, reproduction or barter. Their attitude to Gay and Lesbians is that they should be murdered as their relationships constitute a grevious sin 'against Allah'. Their general attitude to the disabled and minorities (such as Albinos) is that they too should be murdered at birth (infanticide.) Many have similar attitudes to females – indeed the practice of killing female babies is still practiced in many African and in some Arab countries since they are regarded as having 'less value' than male babies.

Again our politicians deliberately conceal these facts from the general public.

As someone who grew up with Jewish, German, Russian, Italian and other children whose parents were fleeing the aftermath of the horrors in Europe – both Stalin and Hitler - and managed to survive concentration camps only to find they had no living relatives – hence starting new families during the 1950s in more peaceful regions, I have an emotional, moral and spiritual dilemma when rejecting anyone fleeing the horrors of war, famine, disease and impoverishment.

But the refugees I knew were very tolerant and forgiving people.

They were not people who would stone women, or gays or other social outcasts (at that time) to death. Indeed they had seen far too much murder and pillage in their own lifetimes to wish it on anyone else.

The refugees we are being asked to welcome I do not recognise as being able in any way to adjust to the values of modern day Christendom (since their Imams forbid it) and my own preference would be to ensure their temporary safe passage and security with no possibility of European citizenship for either themselves or their children, neither through birth or marriage, and their ultimate  return to their homelands after peace is restored – with full compensation offered where they have saved assets during their sojourn in the safety of Christendom.

[There may well be exceptions where some have significantly contributed to Christendom and espouse it's ideals and values, but such should be exceptions rather than the general rule.]


Unfortunately racism and hatreds based on skin color or other racial stereotypes have blurred and fragmented what should be a united and concerted humane approach to the plight of people fleeing for their lives from what is certain death for themselves and their families.

The ideal solution would be that their fellow-Muslim countries would offer to shelter these refugees.

Indeed Turkey and Jordan, the Lebanon and some North African countries have been doing what they can to take in desperate Muslim refugees – and should be praised for their humanitarian efforts which all too often go unrecognised in Christendom. The rich Gulf countries (including, of course, Saudi Arabia) have done virtually nothing to assist in the context of taking in quota numbers of fellow-Muslims.


Those Really Responsible For The Crises Are Not The Helpless Refugees But Our Own European Christian Politicians

Until our politicians decided they would bring 'salvation' and 'democracy' to North Africa and The Middle East, Iraq and Egypt and 'set the people free' these problems did not exist.

We all worked quite happily with stable governments in Africa and the Middle East who ensured that illegal migrants were returned home and never had access to clandestine smugglers since such close monitoring and political controls made any such activities criminal offences, with very severe penalties to such extent that smugglers would not dare undertake such ventures.

What our Christian politicians left these Muslim lands, far from democracy and freedom, is anarchy and chaos, where nobody is in control and people are living in more fear they have ever known since the time of colonial rule of these territories by imperial powers. But don't expect your mainstream media to tell you about the abysmal failures of our politicians and their culpability in what can only be called a complete mess in North Africa and the Middle East.

What they will tell you about is those 'evil' people smugglers – who, by the way, are transporting men, women, children and babies out of harms way to places of safety.

If Jesus was alive, I believe that one of his chosen professions today would be that of a People Smuggler – leading the exodus of those with no hope and in fear for their lives, from war zones, day and night, out of Hades, chaos and evil – to anywhere that they, their families and their children might find survival, regardless of their race or religion or creed.

All I hear about from the same guilty politicians in Christendom is 'swarms' of 'locust' refugees 'pouring' into Europe. Yes it is true. The numbers are, as I have said in earlier blogs, unprecedented and unheard of since the Second World War, but it is these very same politicians who are to blame for the problems they are deflecting to blame onto the hapless refugees and anyone who assists them to reach the shores of Christendom's safety.

Fortunately the Greek, Italian and Maltese authorities recognise the difference between political refugees from those countries we have left in chaos – Libya, Egypt, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, from those we clearly have no obligation to assist – such as economic migrants from Nigeria, Ghana, Gabon, The Congo, Central African Republic, Senegal Pakistan and Southern Africa.


Unfortunately I am no saint so I do have a genuine problem welcoming individuals who do not share any of my values – regardless of their race, color or creed.


As a Christian, however, I would not deny them shelter from the storm but would be partial to denying full citizenship rights, under most circumstances, at any time, to such political refugees.

I share nothing in common with racists who only have hatred for these (unfortunate and blameless) people solely because they are a different religion and ethnicity.

What I would like to see is an honest politician in Christendom who will have the courage to stand up and take responsibility for the unholy mess they have all clearly created through incompetence.

As one of my Marist teachers used to say:

''Show me a man with hair on the palm of his hand and I'l show you an honest politician.''


©Patrick Emek, August 2015

Tuesday 18 August 2015

NBC Invests $200m in BuzzFeed

The decision by NBC to invest big time in Buzzfeed had been rumored for some time but the staggering size of the commitment just underscores what I referred to in my last article.
The media moguls are not making significant inroads into the new mediums whereby the youth (especially the youth) of today are getting their sources of key information.
I said that it was my belief that the days of the media moguls are nearly at an end.
I should have qualified this by saying the 'old' media moguls.
Buzzfeed certainly will give NBC a footprint it was hitherto unable to obtain – being seen as 'old school' but even with such a 'new' portfolio, independent trail blazers will continue to evolve to offer a variety of online access services, entirely free, which are already leaving behind entities such as Buzzfeed.
I will just give one example of this:
One of the main problems has always been the useage of copyright material.
Independent media services are starting to offer free access to archives of materials to freely download for unrestricted useage. This, I believe will become even more common in the future. I would go even further and say that these same outlets will also offer editing and broadcasting software to facilitate the capabilities of any  6th Grader to both download, edit, remodel and podcast materials for educational and other non-profit purposes, without any red tape.
This is already creating a revolution in schools which have in-house technology to take advantage of such new facilities provided by (as yet) a limited number of major world media organizations.
There are many more new developments which the 'old school' media moguls simply cannot stop – like King Canute attempting to turn back the tide – so, in desperation, they will attempt to buy up those identified as 'trail blazers' in the belief that they can at least manage the direction (and impose costs) of such access – rather than allow it to be simply 'given' away.
There is no doubt that such investments will have an impact on the availability of 'free' news (as the ultimate aim of the moguls is to charge for all content on as many mediums that they control.)
Already we can see how they are blocking out public service entities – such as PBS from mainstream (lower income and poor) access.
Even the British BBC (the mother of all propaganda networks) is being threatened with extinction. Recently a former Conservative Minister said that the National Licence fee to support this public service network should be abolished or, at the very least, refusal to pay it be decriminalized. 
It is through this licence fee that the BBC retains it's position as the country's only Public Service Network, independent of commercial (big business) control.
The BBC has been instrumental in the development of 'independent' or State broadcasting services worldwide and has contributed enormously to the fabric of social, political and economic development in many parts of the world, something it could never have achieved as a commercial controlled body.
Organizations like CNN, even today, are not as highly rated, worldwide, for intelligence, accuracy and fair coverage as is the BBC.
When you hear a Conservative (Republican Party) Minister encouraging decriminalization of refusal to support the only British media public asset with a global footprint, you really do need to think carefully about what is the ultimate objective.
[Lord Coe is  reported to have declined an offer made  by British Premier David Cameron to Chair the BBC Trust.  As the Mafia always say, when you want to 'hit' someone you really love (and it's just 'business') don't let it appear that it was you who sent them to 'sleep with the fishes.' No doubt Coe was appreciative of what the true nature of such an appointment would entail so he respectfully declined the offer - at this particular juncture in time.]
All governments want their own local and national media services to be compliant and servile so that they serve the policy interests of commerce.
It's only foreign media services which are to be criticized as 'unfree' (!)
The problem for the BBC is that it failed to evolve with the times and it's present woes, I contend, are a direct result of this inability and of it's past effectiveness - or success - as a vehicle for social and political change.
No government want's an independent media service (see my last article about independent thinkers) as such is too threatening to short-term  objectives pursued by big business and commercial media outlets -such as CNN, Fox, MSNBC.
For example, CNN are running an Anti-Slavery Campaign – a rather unusual move for a network which never reports on slavery and slave wages in countries such as Brazil, China, and anywhere else global companies have outsourced jobs from the U.S. to maximize their profit to a minority of shareholders – at the expense of impoverishing U.S. citizens back home.
Likewise CNN will be amongst the last of the networks to back non-slave wages in the U.S. (a fair minimum wage of at least $15 an hour) because their commercial backers will simply not permit it to happen – until, like the already mentioned Canute, they can no, longer 'stand in the doorway' and block the inevitable 'winds of change' (Bob Dylan, The Times They Are A Changin'.)

So, back to Buzzfeed, yes NBC's investment of $200 million dollars is significant – but only because it emphasises the desperation of the 'old school' to retain control and direction of a rudderless, sometimes also anarchic and unpredictable global media craft.

As more and more digital media entities from developing countries enter the global information stream, can the 'old school' 'freeze' them all out and impose a new order?; only time will tell - but I think you already know the answer.






Bob Dylan, The Times They Are A-Changin' 1964:


Monday 17 August 2015

The Iran Nuclear Deal
Understanding Political Opposition
-From an Independent Thinker-
someone who is not
being paid
to write
about
it

[A Critique For Everyone To Despise]


I have been asked many times, '' why write blogs for free when you can earn money by writing for a well-known publication?;the public don't care, they are all sheep, at least with payment for feeding their stupid minds [the daily mirage - propaganda] you will get something out of it.'' ''They (the general public) are not worthy of the truth – because most are too lazy to go out and 'fight' [protest] or even cast their vote in it's defense.''[paraphrase]

No matter where you are in the world today – the U.S. Russia, China, Iran, Africa or North Korea, an independent thinker writing an article or blogging is probably the most dangerous profession to be in this world.
Challenging a status quo was always a hazardous profession, in any country.

The days of the media moguls controlling what you think has nearly ended – which is why governments have, in desperation, attempted to bring in worldwide legislation restricting or firewalling access to the internet – with the intent to ultimately charge you for download and content, even if, like now, you are accessing it (almost) for free.

So, if you really want to be a futurist activist, get ready to build an 'AlterNet'.

Public service, not journalism, was my first choice for work.
I am not talking about the public service where you sneak in under pretence to undermine the organisation or company whose confidential data you have sworn to protect only to release it under the banner or subterfuge of 'public interest' because you found something you didn't politically agree with in your job, 'woke up' suddenly and decided that Joe Public was your real 'boss' and that you were it's last line of defense in the known universe.

Whistleblowing in Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea are a certain death sentence, dismissal or indefinite solitary detention in their equivalent of Fort Leavenworth, in all of the above countries.  In Arab and African countries, like Saudi Arabia, that would be some rat hole prior to public execution.  In Saudi Arabia, where we (the United States, the 'free' world and it's public representatives) have over decades, all endorsed their evolution and perfection of mediaeval Koranic punishments – including stoning to death, crucifictions, public executions in ''Chop Chop Square''(Saudi Arabia) whistleblowing would be regarded as 'the work of the Devil' punishable by death.  I'll leave it to your imagination what the Muslim fanatics in the certain Arab lands have devised in law as 'punishments' for 'independent thinking' 'crimes' such as 'being a Christian' or 'converting out of Islam' (apostasy) or speaking out against 21st century feudal Muslim rulers or dictators and their families, and the mediaeval Koranic laws, suitably adapted for Arab tribal useage, which guarantee them infinite perpetual rule over the ignorant.
[The most recent dictator of Egypt has just introduced such tyrannical laws, just to keep up to date with his counterparts in the region.]

The worst crime you can commit today therefore is to be an independent thinker.

It's The Lobby Groups, Stupid!
The Jewish Lobby, the Muslim lobby, the Arab lobby, the Iranian lobby, the GM Monsanto lobby, the Chicken lobby, the Drug Companies lobby, the Oil cartels lobby, the Armaments Industry lobby, the Private Healthcare lobby, the No Corporation nor Personal Tax lobby, the White Anglo-Saxon Protestant Lobby, the Irish Lobby, the Catholic Mafia lobby, the Racist Lobby, the Black Caucasus lobby, the Chinese lobby, The Asian lobby, the Neo-Nazi lobby, the Tea Party lobby, the Christian Evangelical Lobby, the Satanists lobby, the White Christian lobby, they will all get you on something if you stand in their way or don't get on your knees to genuflect to their Mammon, deity or Devil-God.

So you really can't win. With ignorant politicians and their lobby masters in the U.S. cracking whips in opposition to the Iran nuclear deal and ignorant politicians and religious fanatics in Iran preaching as much hatred against the United States as anywhere else in the Muslim world, there is no 'right' choice, there is no 'wrong' choice, since no path will, for example, bring all wars to an end with no further loss of life, ever, on earth.
(If you fail to appreciate the latter it's not a problem. It is written for a particular mindset from a particular point in time, and no apologies are offered here for this personal perspective.)
So, you see, there really is no 'Peace' choice in the Iran nuclear deal. Let's just call it a 'temporary cessation' of hatred, murder butchery and senseless slaughter, to the short-term benefit of the non-nuclear and nuclear armaments industries, in one small corner of the planet - which is a more apt description – if the Iran nuclear deal is either agreed or rejected:
I have thus managed to satisfy the 'blood lust' of all sides – by agreeing that a deal or no deal is...... irrelevant....... in the longer scale of things......... for all sides, but at least it represents (maybe) a temporary cessation in bloodletting by all the parties in conflict over resources and territory, in this part of the jungle.

With such 'bright' options for the future from the mainstream media on all sides, I think I'd prefer to take my chances being hated or despised by all sides than endorsed by any one.

They all, like children, play their games, then manipulate a picture of history to suit their lies.

So my advice to you is to be an independent thinker. Consider it as today's equivalent of 'urban guerilla' or 'jungle' warfare - minus the physical weapons of war.

There are probably about 250 million of you out there who think likewise.
(On the brighter side, if united, it's more supporters than ISIL/ISIS has, worldwide!)

Don't worry too much about making your way through the mainstream media jungle – or clawing your way over dead bodies to the top of the pile – just do the right thing.

I endorse the Iran nuclear deal for one very simple reason:
I've heard so much hate (and ignorance in the extreme - many just one can short of a six pack) spewed out against it – with no viable alternative – except more hatred, insanity and war – that, given it's a choice of two evils, anything else, has to be fractionally better.


©Patrick Emek, August 2015

















Friday 14 August 2015





For Consumers





Mom and daughter eating breakfast
En Español
Red envelope icon for Govdelivery Get Consumer Updates by E-mail
pdf icon small Download PDF (312 K)
 On this page:
A healthy breakfast is a must for kids. Skip it and your kids will be playing nutritional catch-up for the rest of the day, says Carole L. Adler, M.A., R.D., a dietitian at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
When kids skip breakfast, they don't get what they need to be at their best, says Adler. “Growing bodies and developing brains need regular, healthy meals,” she says. According to the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, studies show that school children who eat breakfast perform better in the classroom.
As with other meals, it’s a good idea for your kids (and you) to eat a healthy balance of fruits and vegetables, proteins, grains and dairy—not just for breakfast but throughout the day.
Here are Adler’s seven quick and easy breakfast tips to ensure your children start their day off right.
back to top

Breakfast doesn’t have to mean traditional breakfast foods.

Anything goes, as long as you maintain a healthy balance. So if your kids want a change from cereal and eggs, think about serving left-overs from last night’s dinner. There’s nothing wrong with tuna fish with celery on a whole wheat English muffin or a turkey sandwich to start the day.
back to top

Give kids foods they like.

It’s neither necessary nor effective to feed them foods they dislike. Do your kids turn up their noses at vegetables but love pizza? Left-over pizza with a whole-grain crust and veggies works for breakfast, too. Or make muffins with zucchini and carrots, and spread with peanut butter or almond butter for protein with a glass of milk. Your kids love sugary cereal? Mix a little bit of that cereal with a whole-grain, nutrient-packed healthier brand of cereal. “Nothing has to be off the table altogether, and sometimes just a taste of something your kids like is enough to keep them happy,” Adler says.
back to top

Make healthy trade-offs.

Keep in mind that nutritional balance is key—not just for one meal but for foods eaten throughout the day. Not enough vegetables in the morning meal? Prepare extra carrot, celery, and broccoli sticks with a hummus dip as an afternoon snack.
back to top

Take growth and activity levels into account.

Growing bodies need nourishment. And if your kids are physically active to boot, they need plenty of calories to keep them fueled. Adler says that having a breakfast that contains protein, fat and carbohydrates helps children feel full and stay focused until lunch. Protein choices might include an egg, some nuts, a slice of deli meat or cheese, or a container of yogurt.
back to top

Don’t take, “Mom, I don’t have time for breakfast” as an excuse.

Remember, eating on the go doesn’t have to mean forgoing breakfast. Make sure your kids grab a piece of fruit on the way out the door, and hand them a bag of nut-and-fruit trail mix or a whole-wheat tortilla spread with peanut butter or almond butter and a carton of milk. “A fruit-filled shake with milk or yogurt takes only a couple of minutes to drink,” Adler says.
back to top

Prep the night before.

Morning is a busy time for everyone—you included. So take ten minutes to think ahead and prep for breakfast the night before. Chop up fruit to layer in a yogurt parfait or add to cereal. Cut up vegetables for an omelet. Mix up muffin or whole-grain waffle batter, cover, and put in the fridge. Get out a pan for pancakes or a blender for smoothies. Put a bowl of nut-and-fruit trail mix on the table for kids to grab a handful as they walk out the door.
back to top

Use the Nutrition Facts label and ingredient statement when you shop.

“The label makes it easy to determine the amounts of nutrients your kids are getting and to compare one product to another,” Adler says. Make sure your children get nutrient-dense foods that are low in salt and added sugars.
This article appears on FDA's Consumer Updates page, which features the latest on all FDA-regulated products.
August 13, 2015
back to top

For More Information

Page Last Updated: 08/13/2015
Note: If you need help accessing information in different file formats, see Instructions for Downloading Viewers and Players.


Tuesday 4 August 2015

Anonymous

Some decades ago, I was in Portugal as part of an Atlantic Council delegation.
We were entertained by the British Ambassador not at the Embassy but at another very imposing building in the heart of Lisbon.
The Embassy was, at that time, being refitted, so it was not possible for the Ambassador to receive us there.
The building was very beautiful and quite imposing architecturally.
Our host for the evening, highly apologetic for the absence of the Embassy, told us that, as recompence for the loss, he had chosen this imposing establishment as venue.
None present could have been less impressed when the Ambassador outlined it's very colorful history.
Until about a century ago, it had been a high-class Bordello providing discrete entertainment for Portuguese and other noblemen at residence in Lisbon.
At that time I had been reading about the life of William de Vere because M ** whom I knew, was a distant relative.
Before time hopping I will just relate a story from that evening.
Over sherry, a senior Portuguese Minister (who will remain, by me, anonymous) told us the following story:
One night, at about 2.30-3.00 am. the Portuguese Prime Minister was awoken by his Aide- de-Camp to let him know that the British Prime Minister, Margaret Thatcher, was on the telephone requesting to urgently speak with him. For the life of him he could not think why the BPM would chose such an unruly and highly uncivilized hour for parley.
He took the call as courteous as one can be at an hour when other activities are usually more pressing than semantics with a British politician.
It was the time of the Falklands Crisis and Britain urgently needed to use South Atlantic Portuguese territory for refueling en-route.
It was a request to use Portuguese territory both for stopover and refueling.
'Of course you can use our facilities Prime Minister, but tell me this, why has it taken you so long to call?' was the response. [''The Anglo-Portuguese Treaty of 1373 between Portugal and England, is the oldest alliance in the world that is still in force'' and before this telephone call, Britain had never requested from Portugal any assistance nor provision under the terms which it operates for both parties.]
Back to William de Vere.
If you have not already seen the film 'Anonymous' written by John Orloff and directed by Roland Emmerich, I highly recommend it.
Shakespeare is more enigmatic a character than the romantic literature of today portrays and markets him and his works for popular consumption worldwide.
Nowhere in Europe will you find any plaque nor house nor residence with a dedication to William Shakespeare or that he stayed there in passing.
The fact is, Shakespeare never left the confines of the British Isles.
So where then did he amass such wonderful bountiful knowledge about subjects, characters, politics and even short cuts to exotic destinations on the continent, in very fine minute?
It was, as Orloff rightly allures to, either in the 16th century brothels straddling the River Thames or chit chat from mariners in the same whilst on shore leave - themselves having sailed the Seven Seas that, if he did indeed write the works, William Shakespeare got all the material for his masterpieces.
(Shakespeare never gives credits to anyone so we must accept his knowledge as 'self-taught' – or must we?)

Most of Shakespeare's work is 'off-limits' to children below the ages of 11 as most plays are filled with such x-rated material that, if translated into modern language format, such would not be published by many mainstream publication nor media outlets in the United States, if submitted for the first time, today (!)
And now I am coming to the intriguing part of the story:
Orloff's main argument in the film 'Anonymous' is that the plays and sonnets themselves are the work of Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford.
Fortunately his film 'Anonymous' was U.S. released and Emmerich does not really take to heart (nor care about) the British media critical reviews.  If he had, they would not have disappointed. Almost without exception his film met with very frosty acclaim on the English side of the Atlantic. Such was to be expected as he and Orloff had just 'assassinated' an icon of British literature with the upstart inference that, well perhaps Will Shakespeare wasn't quite that saintly enigmatic icon the British have been making him out to be for the past 400 years – indeed perhaps he (or it) is just a very clever (I would even say brilliant) money-spinning deception.
Shakespeare has no pedigree, no legend, and this in itself (as I have always explained to the kids) is the clue or key to solving the mystery.
A bisexual Shakespeare ( Edward de Vere) who spent his life chasing very young boys and girls in the brothels of London (or indeed, in the case of de Vere, exclusively 'procured' – or in today's language 'trafficked' - in the finest of residences on the continent) is not as appealing nor socially (nor financially) acceptable as the very refined educated gentleman with highly conservative civic and deferential values to King, Queen and country, as William Shakespeare is promoted to be, to an international audience, worldwide, by 'the establishment.'

One thing my experience has taught me:the Anglo-Saxons (like many other races) love to hide things - then pretend they never existed(!); the more titillating or controversial they are, the harder a job you'll have discovering the truth.
Emmerich is a genius in his own right so the 'establishment' had some difficulty debunking his production as the work of a 'crank'. If all else fails, just ignore the bugger (!); the film will soon go away – to be forgotten on the 'scrap heap' of undocumented history. This, then, was how the game was played.
Shakespeare is within the holy of holies - the inner sanctum – so fasten your safety belt for a rough ride if thou dare speakest 'au contraire' of 'The Bard' (!)

During the Summer holidays I used to take the kids to the Natural History Museum in Kensington – a short bus ride down the road from where we were based.
There used to be an iconic dinosaur skeleton, affectionately known as 'Dippy', on display in the front podium.
On one occasion when one of the kids remarked how wonderful 'Dippy' 'looked' for his or her age of sixty five million years some smart ass almost spoiled the day with the acerbic remark that it wasn't real, just a fake dinosaur.
My comment was that, whether real or not, I agreed that it certainly looked great for it's age (!); and all was forgiven (!)


©Patrick Emek, 4th August, 2015



The reviews 'Anonymous' received were, for me, highly reminiscent of the reception which Dr Joseph Goldberger had when he proved that Pellagra was a result of diet deficiency. Dr Goldberger was only vindicated a decade after he deceased - too late for the 100 000 victims whose lives were needlessly wasted as a result of racism, pride and bigotry. Few were willing to acknowledge the truth - even with proof - as the cost of implementing reforms were too high for a (mainly)  Southern society convinced that it was a Northern 'conspiracy' against the Southern way of life by an 'outsider' [Dr Goldberger was Jewish, and, even worse for Southern bigots, a New Yorker (!)]



The Bisexuality of Shakespeare's Sonnets and Implications for De Vere's Authorship
Read More: http://guilfordjournals.com/doi/abs/10.1521/prev.2010.97.5.857?journalCode=prev






Blog Archive