As Donald Trump 'Exhorts' His Staff To 'Defy' Congress Subpoenas, What Will Happen Next?

Yesterday (Sunday morning) I watched an interview with a University of Essex (United Kingdom) Professor on CNN where the dynamics of U.S. politics does not appear to have been entirely grasped nor the fundamentals of the dynamics of Congress and what the likely scenario to play out will, more likely than not, be.

For a number of years I was on the editorial board of a Transatlantic Review (based at The University Of Essex) which explained both U.S and U.K. political dynamics through the eyes of the decision makers (see below.)

It is not out of disrespect but more to give an alternative perspective that I  am adding what I think is likely to happen this week and beyond:

Those former White House Staff who have been served with subpoenas and are anxious to clear their names (smeared by Donald Trump in his misleading and false statements) will appear before the Committee (and any sub-Committees requested) to give their evidence and ensure that they have future careers (and working lives!) in their respective professions - free of the criminal charge or, at the very least, free of the inference that, in the year of Our Lord 2019, they had obstructed or had been in contempt of  The Congress Of The United States Of America.

Donald Trump can, if he so wishes, personally stand outside the Committee Room entrance door and summarily ''dissuade'' (using physical force) or execute (with a shot to the head or other part of the body - a procedure very common in North Korea or, indeed, where a Mafia Godfather has been grievously ''disrespected'' - with contempt) each former member of his White House Staff as they pass through on  their way to be received by Congressman Chairman Nadler.    This is his executive privilege.

Those who want to defy a Congress subpoena - on the urging of Donald Trump - which instruction to defy Congress he will of course deny he ever gave in writing saying at some future time, that he was merely expressing his personal opinion and that they (White House Staff) all acted on their own initiative - to defy Congressional subpoenas - without his implicit nor explicit ordering; all those who believe in Trump's supremacy over the provisions of the U.S. Constitution will not appear before Congress.

So brothers and sisters, folks, this is how, in my opinion, the above circus is likely to play out.

[My own view is that history will not look kindly on those current nor former White House Staff who 'stick' their finger(s) up at The Congress Of The United States of America.]

Patrick Emek, April 29, 2019



Epilog:
I was asked if there are any other scenarios to Trump executing former White House Staff outside the door of the Congressional hearing Committee Room.  
There is, as I understand it, just one.  
The White House Legal Counsel could issue an injunction - and hand it (or throw it at!) the subpoenaed attendee outside the Committee Room.  [ I am not joking here (!); as jocular as it might seem (!) ]
However, to enforce an injunction against a Congressional subpoena, could, again as I understand it, in itself, be regarded as a contempt of Congress as Presidential privilege does not supersede (or is not superior to) a Congressional subpoena unless quite clearly covered by presidential executive privilege. 

House Oversight Dem threatens jail for Trump officials who don't comply with subpoenas   by  ARIS FOLLEY - 04/26/19 08:02 AM EDT:

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/440786-house-oversight-dem-threatens-jail-for-trump-officials-who-dont-comply-with

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerry_Nadler

For more about the history of The Centre For European Studies, please visit:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centre_for_European_Studies

This website does not necessarily share the views of the ''Tweet'' from another website below   :)

President Donald  J. Trump

Official U.K. Presidential Visit

(Scheduled For June 2019)

from  Donald Trump's Favorite Medium:

''TWITTER''

The Special Counsel's Investigation Into Russian Interference In the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election:

(Parts I and II)

The attached are the 'unpolished' - but likewise redacted - early DoJ release Of Special Counsel

Robert Mueller's Investigation.

It is unknown by this website what the unredacted version contains.

It is speculated that it may, at least, contain some further insight into Robert Mercer's role as a courier and money launderer for Vladimir Putin and how this interacted with Cambridge Analytica in the context of espionage organized by Russia's GRU through intermediaries.

This may be the most important single investigation ever carried out which details the extent of Russia's penetration of both U.S. politicians and powerful financial entities in order to undermine the United States both domestically and internationally.   (In my opinion, it's ''payback'' for 'losing' the 'Cold War.')

There is one aspect which 'leaps' out at me - and is nowhere within the scope of the Special Counsel's brief:  Trump has surrounded himself with a 'cabal' of individuals whose only 'vision' is Mammon.

As with his son-in-law, they believe that Mammon is the answer to every problem:- simply put enough money on the table and everyone will forsake their ideals and values.   (Perhaps they are right and I am wrong.)  But here's my take:  Such individuals will sell out not only the United States, but the primacy of the Dollar itself -  to any hostile power - if the price (in power and influence) is right - and Mr Putin is acutely aware of this.

This aspect 'leaps' at me when I look at the international (global) extent and reach of these Trump- supporter-billionaires - and almost all of The President's Cabinet are a part of this 'cabal'.

All of such matters were way way beyond the Pale - far beyond the brief of Special Counsel Mueller.

I would ask you to keep them in mind when you cross-reference Parts I and II of The Special Counsel's Investigation with known information about this 'cabal' surrounding President Donald J. Trump.   (You can find most of such individuals discussed in blogs at this website - so you don't have to 'travel' nor 'troll' all over the internet to find out who they all are.)

That's my (unusual)  'Takeaway' from the Mueller Report.    

Now read the unpolished (but redacted) Special Counsel's Investigation, Parts I and II, by clicking on the links below.

Patrick Emek, April 2019





https://drive.google.com/open?id=1zya__z0kBJZv_stSwaDNY8RTBqtdIZ70

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1zyrQhpB98k5Hds01EZNA2gmtBS1issiM

erratum: 

March 2017 was the first published date of this blog 

[One of the names redacted from The Published Mueller Report in the context of Cambridge Analytica and Hillary Clinton being targeted by Russia's GRU]

• repost from March 2017:

(reposted April 2019)

ROBERT MERCER :— 

MONEY LAUNDERER FOR 

VLADIMIR PUTIN

Renaissance Technologies (RENTEC) is the second largest hedge fund in the US, managing $45 billion in assets. It has a reputation for being the most successful hedge fund in history, for using quantitative trading strategies designed by top scientists, and for being extremely secretive.Publicly available information on RENTEC implies that the firm is a massive money laundering tool disguised as a hedge fund, operating on behalf of Vladimir PUTIN.

BACKGROUND

Money laundering involves a transaction where illicit money is spent by one party, producing a seemingly legitimate profit for another party. Ostensibly the two parties are unrelated, but in reality, both parties are closely connected.
The money laundering process can be summarized in three steps:
• SOURCE Secure illegally sourced funds.
• TRANSACT Illegal money is used in a transaction, resulting in profits for another party.
• COVER UP The true nature of the transaction is visible only to insiders.
Evidence suggests money laundering via financial markets works like this:
• SOURCE Criminal organization invests in a hedge fund (Fund A) operating in a market with a high degree of corruption (for example Russia).
• TRANSACT On behalf of Fund A, an international bank purchases a security in the corrupted market. The bank then sells(i.e. shorts) the same security in a second developed market (for example the UK), and forwards the proceeds to Fund B. Both funds are owned by the same criminal organization.
• COVER UP The nature of the transactions are obfuscated with advanced financial techniques and the inner workings of the fund are kept secret.
A significant degree of sophistication is required to launder money in plain sight via financial markets. Due to this sophistication, it’s unlikely direct evidence will come to light without access to internal records. However, by using other cases as a guide, the following mosaic of indirect evidence will likely be found:
• SOURCE Key people are connected to criminal organizations via one or more intermediaries.
• TRANSACT An abnormally high rate of return that allows significant amounts of money to be laundered in a short amount of time. Evidence of buying and selling the same securities in different markets.
• COVER UP History of using financial engineering to hide the nature of transactions and a reputation for extreme secrecy.

SOURCE

Russia is controlled by a vast organization comprised of the intelligence services, organized crime and big business. This organization is led by Vladimir PUTIN and control is maintained through corruption, blackmail and assassination. (1)Because of the high degree of control PUTIN has over Russian centers of power, all Russians in positions of influence should be assumed to have at least PUTIN’s blessing. Any persons significantly connected with these Russians are likely contributing to PUTIN’s goals either witting or otherwise.

Robert MERCER is co-CEO of RENTEC. MERCER is the largest financial backer of Donald TRUMP’s presidential campaign, and an influential funder of Republicans and conservatives causes including Citizens United. (2)

MERCER invested in data science firm CAMBRIDGE ANALYTICA. MERCER insisted TRUMP campaign hire CAMBRIDGE ANALYTICA to design its social media strategy. Through CAMBRIDGE ANALYTICA and its owner Vincent TCHENGUIZ, MERCER is connected to PUTIN protégé Dmitry FIRTASH and Russian Intelligence Services (RIS). (3, 4)

March 2017 MERCER’s yacht the ‘Sea Owl’ was spotted in the British Virgin Islands, anchored next to Dmitry RYBOLOVLEV’s yacht the ‘Anna.’ RYBOLOVLEV is a member of PUTIN’s inner circle and likely his personal courier. (5)

MERCER is part owner of BREITBART news. The FBI is investigating BREITBART and CAMBRIDGE ANALYTICA for cooperating with RIS during the 2016 US election. Evidence suggests that CAMBRIDGE ANALYTICA and BREITBART used information warfare techniques in cooperation with RIS to support TRUMP and attack Hillary CLINTON. (3, 6, 7)

Several of RENTEC’S Russian born employees have been in the news:

• In the late 1990s Alexey KONONENKO was given a prominent role within RENTEC’s equities group. His rapid promotion was questioned by colleagues and characterized as a “power play.” (8)

• In 2001 RENTEC sued two Russian employees Alexander BELOPOLSKY & Pavel VOLFBEYN for intellectual property theft after they left for rival fund Millennium Partners. (8)

• In 2006 Alexander ASTASHKEVICH shot and killed his wife and himself. (9)

Prior to starting RENTEC in 1982, the firm’s founder Jim SIMONS was a cryptologist, contracted to the NSA. Like Edward SNOWDEN, SIMONS would have been a valued target for recruitment by RIS. (10)

2014 RENTEC received media attention for increasing its holding in Russian telecom company VIMPLECOM. Newsworthy because the stock was dropping following Russia’s annexation of Crimea. In 2016 RENTEC further increased its holding in VIMPLECOM by 438%. VIMPLECOM is controlled by PUTIN insider Mikhail FRIDMAN. (11)

TRANSACT
In the past 20 years the average hedge fund returned 9% per year. In the same period RENTEC’s “MEDALLION” fund averaged 40%. After twenty years, one-thousand dollars invested in the average hedge fund would be worth nearly six-thousand dollars, the same investment made in MEDALLION would be worth over eight hundred-thousand dollars. (22)

RENTEC has long claimed that it must limit the size of its MEDALLION fund (most recently at $10 billion) in order to preserve its high rates of return. So, it was newsworthy when shortly after the election of Donald TRUMP the firm announced that it would be increasing the fund’s size by fifty percent and that employees would only have several weeks to raise additional funds. This would increase the fund to $15 billion and at current rates of return would produce a profit of $6 billion in 2017. In normal years virtually all profits of the fund are returned to investors instead of being re-invested. This unusual degree of cash returned to investors could be used to facilitate money laundering. (22)

Hedge funds are normally secretive in order to prevent competitors from copying their investment strategies. However, RENTEC is not only secretive about its strategies, but also about its financial position and executive compensation. For this reason, very little is known about internal workings of the firm. What can be pieced together is RENTEC uses quantitative models to buy and sell millions of stocks a year based on statistical ARBITRAGE strategies. Statistical ARBITRAGE attempts to make money by buying one security and selling another. These securities could be similar stocks in the same industry, or the same security trading in different markets.

COVER UP 

In 2017 DEUTSCHE BANK was fined $425 million by the US government for laundering $10 billion out of RUSSIA using a scheme known as MIRROR TRADES. The scheme involved a customer in Moscow ordering DEUTSCHE BANK to buy shares for Rubles and then to immediately sell an identical amount of the same shares in London for Dollars. (14)

The money used in the scheme belonged to Igor Putin (cousin of Vladimir PUTIN) and the ROTENBERG brothers who are old friends of PUTIN. Investigators speculated that MIRROR TRADES where a part of a much larger money laundering operation but to date no additional evidence has been made public. To outsiders MIRROR TRADES are nearly indistinguishable from ARBITRAGE. (14)

MIRROR TRADES were kept under the radar by trading “over the counter”, and through a remote booking feature that did not require direct participation of the London office. Records showing losses at the end of the trading day would mysteriously show zero losses at the beginning of the next day. This strongly indicates traders were JOURNALING assets (moving assets between accounts) in order to make up for losses in one account with gains from another. (14, 15)

RENTEC is currently under investigation by the IRS for using a similar financial engineering structure to MIRROR TRADES known as BASKET OPTIONS (an option containing many different securities). Congressional investigators have claimed BASKET OPTIONS were used to avoid taxes and limitations on leverage, but they could also be used to facilitate money laundering. On behalf of the MEDALLION fund, RENTEC purchased an option from DEUTSCHE BANK and then sold the option one year later and claimed the long-term tax rate (24%) applied. In reality RENTEC exercised full control of the contents of the option, and executed hundreds of millions of high frequency transactions a year, most lasting only milliseconds. (16, 17)

If the IRS finds that RENTEC should be charged the short-term tax rate (44%), the fund will owe $6.8 billion. 2017 McClatchy reported on the investigation and specifically linked the possible tax bill with the increasing investments in political candidates made by RENTEC executives. 

Two weeks after the report was published the author Scott CHRISTIANSON died from massive head trauma at his home. (16, 18)

Evidence presented to US Congressional committee investigating RENTEC show that DEUTSCHE BANK allowed RENTEC to JOURNAL assets between sub accounts, thereby avoiding market transactions of buying and repurchasing the same security that could be interpreted as manipulative trading. Other evidence included emails from William BROEKSMIT, the DEUTSCHE BANK employee charged with managing the BASKET OPTIONS for RENTEC where he went into detail how the scheme was executed. 

In 2014 BROEKSMIT was found dead in his London apartment as result of hanging. (16, 19)

RENTEC is also currently under investigation by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. RENTEC has resisted calls from the agency to hand over source code that runs MEDALLION’s trading algorithms. (20)

RENTEC manages three separate funds, two of these funds are available to outside investors. The third fund is the highly secretive MEDALLION and only accepts money from RENTEC employees. Records show that only five executives own seventy percent of the fund. In 2009, investors in the public funds were unhappy that MEDALLION’s returns far exceeded returns of their investments. These complaints led to an SEC investigation. SIMONS took the blame and resigned, making MERCER co-CEO together with IBM colleague and former roommate Peter BROWN. (21, 23)

CONCLUSION
The preceding sections demonstrate RENTEC has connections with Russian elites, produces extremely high rates of return via ARBITRAGE transactions, and engages in financial engineering techniques that are functionally equivalent to known money laundering methods. These are all red flags that imply RENTEC is involved in money laundering on behalf of Vladimir PUTIN.

The evidence suggests that RENTEC is a massive Russian money laundering operation hiding under the guise of a highly successful hedge fund. The scheme functions similar to MIRROR TRADES where shares are purchased in Moscow, immediately sold by RENTEC in the US, recorded as RENTEC’s profit, and the shares JOURNALED between US and Moscow accounts by DEUTSCHE BANK. RENTEC hides this scheme by executing hundreds of millions of trades a year, by using BASKET OPTIONS, and by limiting investment of the fund to RENTEC insiders. Every year RENTEC is capable of washing funds equal to the annual profits of its MEDALLION fund which are estimated at $6 billion this year.

For this scheme to be successful, all senior RENTEC leadership would have been involved including MERCER and SIMONS. In the 2016 election cycle MERCER spent $15 million on Republican candidates with the majority going towards supporting Donald TRUMP. In the same year SIMONS also spent $15 million, but on Democratic candidates, much of it going towards Hillary CLINTON. Regardless of the election result, PUTIN was guaranteed to have an agent with significant influence on the President of the United States.

q@q502q502

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

Sources

1. Fiona Hill, Mr. Putin: Operative in the Kremlin, 2015
2. Jane Mayer, The Reclusive Hedge-Fund Tycoon Behind the Trump Presidency, The New Yorker, 2017
3. Carole Cadwalladr, Robert Mercer: the big data billionaire waging war on mainstream media, The Gaurdian, 2017
4. Ann Marlowe, WILL DONALD TRUMP’S DATA-ANALYTICS COMPANY ALLOW RUSSIA TO ACCESS RESEARCH ON U.S. CITIZENS?, Tablet, 2016
5. John Pacenti, Yachts of Trump financial backer, Russian oligarch seen close together, My Palm Beach Post, 2017
6. Kate Brannen, DID RUSSIANS TARGET DEMOCRATIC VOTERS, WITH KUSHNER’S HELP?, Newsweek, 2017
7. Daniel Halper, Breitbart and InfoWars are drawn into FBI’s Russian bot probe, NY Post, 2017
8. Katherine Burton, Inside a Moneymaking Machine Like No Other, Bloomberg, 2016
9. Kieran Crowley, TRAGIC SIBERIA ‘EXILE’ — FOR SLAY-SUICIDE BOY, NY Post, 2017
10. wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Harris_Simons
11. Jesse Solomon, What geopolitical risk? Hedge funds bet on Russia, CNN Money, 2014
12. Richard Rubin, How an Exclusive Hedge Fund Turbocharged Its Retirement Plan, Bloomberg, 2015
13. Nathan Vardi, Renaissance And Two Sigma, Growing At Stunning Pace, Now Nation’s 2nd Biggest Hedge Funds, Forbes, 2017
14. Ed Caesar, Deutsche Bank’s $10-Billion Scandal, The New Yorker, 2016
15. NY ST DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, In the Matter of DEUTSCHE BANK AG and DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCH, 2017
16. Scott Christianson, Billionaire Robert Mercer did Trump a huge favor. Will he get a payback?, McClatchy, 2017
17. US Senate PERMANENT SUBCOMMITTEE ON INVESTIGATIONS, ABUSE OF STRUCTURED FINANCIAL PRODUCTS, 2014
18. Casey Seiler, Scott Christianson, 69, acclaimed journalist, author and advocate, Times Union, 2017
19. Michael Gray, Why are so many bankers committing suicide?, NY Post, 2017
20. Kevin Dugan, Quant fund is concerned about CFTC getting its software code, NY Post, 2017
21. Mariah Blake, Why Are These Hedge Fund Kingpins Dumping Millions Into the Midterms?, Mother Jones, 2014
22. Miles Weiss, Renaissance’s Medallion Made a Stunning Shift After Trump’s Election, Bloomberg, 2017
23. Pamela Roux, Is Trump Backer Robert Mercer a Billionaire? I Tried to Find Out, Bloomberg, 2017


Part II

Please accept my apologies for the poor quality 
of the print below.
If you require a clear print of Mr Litvinenko's Memo of 1998 and the ghosted Russian-language official correspondences you can now obtain them from:

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/1k973c02jaz0f7r/AACoIMZlSCl_WXvW2I-S0kHZa/Tuesday%20-%20Day%202?dl=0&preview=Russia-as-a-Criminal-Organization_ANASTASIA-KIRILENKO.pdf

Repost

The Christopher Steele Dossier

Trump With 2 Prostitutes, then a Third engaged In Moscow Hotel Urination Revenge Act by Trump Against President Barack and First Lady Mrs Michelle Obama:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1eHYXEFp0GlJKyjzIQ1qLxEBxQaK5Xuda

the edited version

''I Will Not Follow Orders''

[History Repeating]

(The Backstory)

A number of my blogs have interesting backstories or prologues.  This is one such blog.

Some time ago I was asked by a XXXXXXX XXX  XXXXXXXX ''what would you do if you were given an order or instruction you knew to be wrong or illegal?''  I enquired whether he/she meant in writing or verbally.  The reply I got was ''doesn't matter'' (sic. whether in writing or verbally.)

I immediately brought up Nuremberg as a classic example of ''I was only following orders'' - and the legitimacy of this argument when applied to commands issued by higher authority during a time of war:

''What about those British RAF pilots who bombed Dresden killing tens of thousands of German civilians - men women and children - in a heat inferno where the very skin and flesh on their bones melted away leaving charcoaled ash and bone fragments?''; what about those German Luftwaffe bomber pilots who mercilessly bombed Coventry killing hundreds of men, women and children and reducing the city to rubble?'' 

''Is everyone who follows orders - no matter how legal or illegal those orders were - to be brought to trial at  a Nuremberg-style show-trial - of the victors over the vanquished?''

Believe me, if Germany had won the Second World War, Churchill and his Cabinet would have been in the dock in Dresden or in Berlin - as War Criminals - no different from that of The German High Command at Nuremberg.

So this is where the discussion started - and it provided me with the incentive to look closely at what Donald J. Trump, President Of The United States, appeared to be initiating - encouraging the breaking of laws he disliked but could not persuade Congress to revoke by democratic means.

There will come an 'after Trump' era, and, there will be [political] ''scores'' to be settled, on Judgement Day.

The more misery Trump creates the more vengeance there will be to reaped when that time comes.

As merciless as he has been with others, so too will this befall him and his scattered entourage

'' When The Man Comes Around.'' 

[Now read that ensuing blog, again, if you have the time.]



© Patrick Emek, April 2019



https://14wombat1.blogspot.com/2018/06/the-edited-version-i-will-not-follow_93.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coventry_Blitz

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_Dresden_in_World_War_II


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_trials