The
Grand Design
Leading
By Example
Over
the last weekend The Holy Father made a pronouncement that each
Parish within Christendom should take in at least one refugee family
fleeing into Europe mainly from wars which our politicians have
created in Iraq, Syria, Libya, Afghanistan, Yemen, the Horn of
Africa.
This
is in keeping with the Christian spirit of both hospitality and
protection of those vulnerable and fleeing persecution.
I
should add that over the course of the centuries the The
Franciscan, Jesuit and the Marist Orders (with which I am
familiar) have all suffered martyrdom throughout the world (especially in the Americas and in Africa) in the process
of protecting refugees.
It
therefore came as not entirely a surprise to me that, where all the
politicians have failed (and the presence of these particular
refugees in Europe, in their hundreds of thousands, are, in my
opinion, the results of this failure) The Pontiff should take the
lead role in Christendom in giving moral guidance in how we should
deal with this matter.
The
fact that The Holy Father is welcoming two refugee families into his
own home is a lesson in leading by example. (I believe that a
former Hungarian Premier has offered similar sanctuary in his own
home to a family fleeing to Christendom from persecution.)
Other
prominent (and brave) politicians in Europe (from Finland, Denmark
and Luxemburg if I am correct) are also leading by example.
Having
A Blueprint
The
practical issues as I see it, are complicated by the presence of so
many extremist Imams in Christendom. We cannot successfully
integrate such new arrivals, given the current historical situation,
with so many Imams ready to 'program' the new Muslim 'flock' into
their extremist ideologies from day one of resettlement.
(Some
of these ISIL-supporting Imams – and all of whom are Salafist and
Wahhabist-supporting individuals – have been allowed to quietly
pack their bags and head on home to Saudi Arabia or Egypt or Jordan,
to avoid diplomatic embarrassment.)
The
rest of their acolytes remain to receive instructions via the
internet or cable TV from the fanatics who preach hatred against
Christendom from the safety of Saudi Arabia 24/7 on the airwaves. If
only the general public had a translation of the vile hatred which
these evil individuals preach 24/7 from Saudi Arabia on the internet
and television they would have a different view of the Kingdom as not
just feudal and tyrannical but an affront to Christians worldwide.
This
is issue number one.
Then
there are the practical issues of housing, jobs, education and
healthcare.
Because
of
the world recession (caused by a multiple factors - all of which
you will find discussed better and more frankly in my blogs than in
or on 'The Daily Mirage' – all designed
to 'feed' your ignorance to the point of overweight) there are major
cutbacks in central government and local administration spending to
offset the effects of falling exports and central government
revenues. For this reason properly vetted bona fide Muslim families
already domiciled in Christendom should be invited by the authorities
to play their part in assisting with resettlement. In view of The
Holy Father's pronouncement this would be entirely in keeping with
his thoughts and sentiments. Of course where there is no Muslim family
living in a Parish, this responsibility would initially be with a
well-to-do (financially capable) member of the local Parish. Should no
such person exist locally, then each Parish, (as I interpret it) must
come up with it's own solution to fulfill the pronouncement.
(I am assuming that The Holy Father has thought long and prayed on this matter - as such is the only temporal power he has today - and it is for this reason that I am saying what I have above.) It would be far less costly if some financial incentive was given to a Muslim or, where none exist, to a Christian family, in each Parish by local administrations to assist with a Government-led and monitored program for resettlement or temporary residence through civic training and instruction.
(I am assuming that The Holy Father has thought long and prayed on this matter - as such is the only temporal power he has today - and it is for this reason that I am saying what I have above.) It would be far less costly if some financial incentive was given to a Muslim or, where none exist, to a Christian family, in each Parish by local administrations to assist with a Government-led and monitored program for resettlement or temporary residence through civic training and instruction.
This
would be more cost-effective than for such matters to be
unstructured.
Accepting
that refugees are not willing migrants, efforts should also be made
to encourage and support self-reliance. The government, banks and
tax incentives are methods to assist this process.
It has been mentioned in some reports that ISIS/ISIL/The Islamic Caliphate are no doubt using this crisis to infiltrate members into Europe as 'sleeper' cells.
I have avoided commenting on this for two reasons:
The first is because most refugees are undoubtedly genuine and to label them all as potential terrorists does nothing to alleviate their suffering - it only increases it. The second reason is because this is an ongoing intelligence matter best left to those in the field and whose job it is to manage the issue.
It has been mentioned in some reports that ISIS/ISIL/The Islamic Caliphate are no doubt using this crisis to infiltrate members into Europe as 'sleeper' cells.
I have avoided commenting on this for two reasons:
The first is because most refugees are undoubtedly genuine and to label them all as potential terrorists does nothing to alleviate their suffering - it only increases it. The second reason is because this is an ongoing intelligence matter best left to those in the field and whose job it is to manage the issue.
'Welcome'
Is Not An Invitation To Restructure Christendom As A Christian Entity
I
also believe that Christendom needs to be proactive in the
application of practical measures which can be taken to ensure the
new arrivals are both welcomed and are aware that they are now living
in Christendom and must either abide by its more basic requirements
of secularity or seek sanctuary elsewhere.
Déjà
vu
So
getting the politicians to 'back off' may not be as easy as it
sounds, especially if the mainstream media are either ignorant of
'The Great Game' (which in many cases they are - being more
concerned with celebrity issues and news trivia - at the desired wish
of their coprorate owners) than genuine news research and
analysis.
But
the most important issue of all is enabling such refugees to return
to their beloved homelands and such is impossible with politicians we
currently have who are hell-bent on more wars in Syria and, some
years down the line, The Caspian Sea region (read my previous blogs
about Iran and The Nuclear Deal-Is There More To It Than Meets The
Eye) – the new oil , gold, strategic mineral 'El Dorado' of the
latter part of this century.
Yes
folks, as you sit there oblivious, new wars and strategies for
strategic asset 'protection' have been mapped out involving another
part of the world. Well they would not be called planned wars but
strategies to defend the Caspian Sea assets from, say, a terrorist
attack. Such plans can easily be 'flipped' to incorporate different
scenarios. Dual function strategies are not unheard of.
If
you think that this is inaccurate or far-fetched, do your own
research and see what conclusions you arrive at.
Exodus
Therefore,
enabling the refugees to return back home may be a more difficult
task that it at first appears.
There
may be more money to be made leaving these political refugees in
(forlorn) exile in Christendom for a long time and letting extremists
dictate a more favorable local policy agenda which is 'managed' by
Turkey and Saudi Arabia on our behalf in their ancestoral lands, than
one or two million hapless 'opponents' to these murderous extremist
regimes being allowed to return home - as opposed to living
'overseas' (in Christendom.) At least their fellow-brother Muslims
will be spared the 'trauma' of murdering such opponents, men, women
and children, in the millions, (by wholesale butchery and slaughter)
and can therefore more quickly set up their Caliphates and the like,
with little to no 'home-grown' opposition.
And
the general public, oblivious to the 'greater plan', continue to
blame the hapless refugees for 'the problem' of their presence.
Under
such circumstances getting the refugees home may be a longer-term
project than most people would imagine or are aware – and one which
our own politicians are simply not interested in as they (or a core
cabal of them) have other more pressing corporate agendas to
implement.
Déjà vu section amended 13th September, 2015:
paragraph deleted
Having A Blueprint
Déjà vu section amended 13th September, 2015:
paragraph deleted
Having A Blueprint
addendum:paragraph
on 17th September
©Patrick
Emek, September 2015
